Checking the validity of confrontation with preferential rulings

Abstract
The profound effect of mustahabs in directing the religious culture of the society and preserving the divine faith and values ​​is not hidden from anyone, but it is observed that some people, for whatever reason, take steps to downplay the preferential rules of Islam under the pretext that it is not necessary.
The present article tries to prove the sanctity of action in order to weaken the practical rulings through verses, hadiths and the reason of reason. First, a few verses on the issue of severely forbidding the good of God and forbidding the good and forbidding the good and misguidance of the people. Condemnation has been raised and then widely mentioned several sects of narrations that are witnesses in the matter. His charity and credit have been discussed, and in terms of brokerage, a complete explanation has been given about the well-known inclusion of the mustahabs with reference to verses and narrations, as well as a discussion about the inclusion of commands and prohibitions towards any practical action and its non-monopoly. A verbal invitation has been raised.